|
Chapter 19
SB1015
Effective Date
General
|
LAW ENFORCEMENT, EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
COOPERATION
Sen. Waring
Authorizes a law enforcement officer
who reasonably believes that a person may have committed a DUI, Extreme DUI
or Aggravated DUI to request health care emergency department personnel to
provide a copy of any written or electronic report of the person’s Blood
Alcohol Concentration.
Requires the officer to obtain
permission from the emergency department director or the director’s designee
in order to speak with the personnel. Permission can not be refused, but
may be delayed if taking the personnel away from patient care duties could
cause patient harm. Emergency department personnel must comply with the
request but are not required to determine probable cause on their own.
Emergency room personnel are not liable for complying with the request
unless acting with gross negligence.
Statute(s) Created: 28-1390
Court Impact: Informational.
Back to Top |
|
Chapter 29 SB1076
Effective Date
General
|
PEDESTRIAN CONTROL SIGNALS
Sen. Linda Gray
Expands the definition of pedestrian
control signals to include symbols indicating a walking person and an
upraised hand.
Statute(s) Impacted: 28-646
Court Impact: Informational.
Back to Top |
|
Chapter 32 SB1161
Effective Date
General
|
Item of interest to: |
|
|
|
Justice of the Peace Court
Court Clerk
Court Administrator
Judge |
|
Municipal Court
Court Clerk
Court Administrator
Judge/Magistrate |
| |
|
HOV LANES; MOTORCYCLES; BUSES
Sen. Tibshraeny
Permits motorcycles and public
transportation vehicles, regardless of the number of passengers, to use a
high occupancy vehicle lane.
Defines public transportation vehicle.
Statute(s) Impacted: 28-737
Court Impact:
Informational.
Back to Top |
|
Chapter 39 HB2052
Effective Date
General
|
Item of interest to: |
|
Superior Court
Clerk of Court
Court Administrator
Judge |
|
Justice of the Peace Court
Court Clerk
Court Administrator
Judge |
|
|
| |
|
VEHICLE USE; CAUSING DEATH; INJURY
Rep. Biggs
Blends the two versions of A.R.S.
§28-672 enacted last year. Adds A.R.S. §28-857 (A) to the predicate
offenses in A.R.S. §28-672.
Repeals the prior version of §28-672
and sunset date. Adds A.R.S. §28-857 (A) to predicate offenses in A.R.S.
§28-672, Causing serious physical injury or death by a moving violation;
A.R.S. §STATUTE28-675, Causing death by use of a vehicle; and A.R.S.
§28-676, Causing serious physical injury by use of a vehicle.
Statute(s) Impacted: 28-672,
28-675, 28-676
Court Impact:
Alters the classification of failure to stop for a school bus,
under certain circumstances.
Back to Top |
|
Chapter 145 SB1455
Effective Date
Conditional
|
Item of interest to: |
|
|
|
Justice of the Peace Court
Court Clerk
Court Administrator
Judge |
|
Municipal Court
Court Clerk
Court Administrator
Judge/Magistrate |
| |
|
LOW SULFUR DIESEL FUEL STANDARDS
Sen. Allen
Identifies additional conduct that
constitutes a Class 2 misdemeanor under the existing A.R.S. § 41-2113
relating to the sale of diesel fuel, labeling of diesel fuel dispensers and
use of product transfer documents.
Statute(s) Impacted: 41-2083,
41-2083
Court Impact:
Could result in additional misdemeanor filings for violation. Under current
law, the attorney general and the county attorney have concurrent
jurisdiction to prosecute violations.
Back to Top |
|
Chapter 154
SB1118
Effective Date
General
|
Item of interest to: |
|
Superior Court
Clerk of Court
Court Administrator
Judge |
|
Justice of the Peace Court
Court Clerk
Court Administrator
Judge |
|
Municipal Court
Court Clerk
Court Administrator
Judge/Magistrate |
| |
|
VEHICLE ACCIDENTS; MINIMUM REPORTING
REQUIREMENT
Sen. Chuck Gray
Increases the classification of Leaving
the scene of an accident involving death or personal injury from a Class 4
to a Class 3 felony, except that if a driver caused the accident the driver
is guilty of a Class 2 felony. Increases the classification of Leaving the
scene of a damage-only accident from a Class 3 to a Class 2 misdemeanor.
Statute(s) Impacted: 28-661,
28-662
Court Impact:
Also, reclassifies a failure to stop or give information or assistance at
the scene of an accident leading to injury that is not serious as a class 5
felony (currently a class 6 felony).
Back to Top |
|
Chapter 155 SB1131
Effective Date
General
|
Item of interest to: |
|
Superior Court
Clerk of Court
Court Administrator
Judge |
|
Justice of the Peace Court
Court Clerk
Court Administrator
Judge |
|
Municipal Court
Court Clerk
Court Administrator
Judge/Magistrate |
| |
|
TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS; STATUTE OF
LIMITATIONS
Sen. Chuck Gray
Requires a civil traffic violation case
to be commenced as follows:
-
Within 60 days of an alleged
violation if commenced by issuance of a citation,
-
Within 60 days of an alleged
violation if commenced by filing of a citation and must be served within
90 days from the filing date,
-
Within one year of the alleged
violation if the alleged violation is under investigation in conjunction
with an accident resulting in death (180 days if the accident under
investigation does not involve death).
Statute(s) Impacted: 28-1592
Court Impact:
Potential impact to photo enforcement programs due to time limitation for
service.
Back to Top |
|
Chapter 159 SB1229
Effective Date
General
|
Item of interest to: |
|
Superior Court
Clerk of Court
Court Administrator
Judge |
|
Justice of the Peace Court
Court Clerk
Court Administrator
Judge |
|
Municipal Court
Court Clerk
Court Administrator
Judge/Magistrate |
| |
|
AGGRAVATED DUI; PROBATION;
INCARCERATION
Sen. Waring
In an Aggravated DUI case, the time a
probationer is on absconder status or the time the person is incarcerated is
excluded when determining the 84 month look- back period.
Statute(s) Impacted: 28-1383
Court Impact:
Alters case processing time calculation requirements for Aggravated DUI
cases, and may result in additional Aggravated DUI charges.
Back to Top |
|
Chapter 182 HB2001
Effective Date
Delayed
01/01/2009
|
Item of interest to: |
|
|
|
Justice of the Peace Court
Court Clerk
Court Administrator
Judge |
|
Municipal Court
Court Clerk
Court Administrator
Judge/Magistrate |
|
Administrative Office of the Courts |
|
DEFENSIVE DRIVING SCHOOLS
Rep. Jim Weiers
Upon the expiration of all contracts
that are in existence on July 1, 2007 between the court and a defensive
driving school provider, an eligible individual who elects to attend a
defensive driving school is permitted to attend any Supreme Court certified
defensive driving school that complies with the court automation and
reporting requirements The renewal of any contract between a court and a
defensive driving school after July 1, 2007 will be considered a new
contract. Authorizes a court to adopt requirements for a school to
electronically report school completions and transfer funds, subject to the
approval of the Defensive Driving Board.
Statute(s) Impacted: 28-3393
Court Impact:
Effective January 1, 2009, courts must allow eligible traffic violators to
attend any supreme court certified Defensive Driving School. A court may
require that a school electronically report school completions and
electronically transfer funds, subject to the approval of the Defensive
Driving Board. Any contract renewed by a court after July 1, 2007, is
considered a new contract.
Back to Top |
|
Chapter 195 SB1252
Effective Date
General
|
Item of interest to: |
|
|
|
Justice of the Peace Court
Court Clerk
Court Administrator
Judge |
|
Municipal Court
Court Clerk
Court Administrator
Judge/Magistrate |
|
|
|
EXTREME DUI; SENTENCE
Sen. Waring
In an Extreme DUI, removes the ability
of the court to suspend any portion of the minimum required jail sentence.
Authorizes the court after a first conviction to order a person not to
consume alcohol for 30 days or more through continuous alcohol monitoring or
twice daily alcohol testing. Following a second or subsequent Extreme DUI,
the court may order a person not to consume alcohol for 90 days or more
through continuous alcohol monitoring or twice daily alcohol testing.
Statute(s) Impacted: 9-499.07,
11-459, 28-1382
Court Impact:
Removes the authority of the court to suspend any portion of the jail time
for a first or second offense Extreme DUI. The court may require compliance
with an order not to consume alcohol be demonstrated through continuous
monitoring or twice daily testing.
Back to Top |
|
Chapter 206 HB2033
Effective Date
Delayed
07/01/2008
|
Item of interest to: |
|
Superior Court
Clerk of Court
Court Administrator
Judge |
|
Justice of the Peace Court
Court Clerk
Court Administrator
Judge |
|
Municipal Court
Court Clerk
Court Administrator
Judge/Magistrate |
| |
|
TEENAGE DRIVER SAFETY ACT
Rep. McComish
Expands the restrictions of the Class G
driver license to prohibit a licensee from driving between midnight and 5
A.M. during the first six months of licensure unless accompanied by a parent
or legal guardian or driving to or from listed locations or events.
Restricts the licensee from driving with more than one passenger under the
age of 18 unless the passengers are the driver’s siblings or the driver is
accompanied by a parent or legal guardian. Assesses the following:
-
For a first violation, a maximum $75
civil penalty and extension of the restrictions for 30 days
-
For a second violation, a maximum
$100 civil penalty and an extension of the restrictions for 60 days
-
For a third or subsequent violation,
a maximum civil penalty of $100 and suspension of the individual’s driver
license for 30 days.
Requires the court to dismiss a
citation for violation of any restriction if a notarized letter from a
parent or legal guardian is submitted as proof that a licensee was en route
to or from a permitted event or that the minors in the vehicle were the
siblings of the licensee or from an employer, school or religious official
stating the licensee was returning from a permitted event in order for a
citation to be dismissed.
Applies to permits and licenses issued
after June 30, 2008.
Statute(s) Impacted: 28-3153,
28-3154, 28-3156, 28-3174, 28-3321
Court Impact:
Courts that handle driver’s license violations involving teenagers should
review this bill for detailed requirements and impact.
Back to Top |
|
Chapter 208 HB2291
Effective Date
General
|
Item of interest to: |
|
Superior Court
Clerk of Court
Court Administrator
Judge |
|
Justice of the Peace Court
Court Clerk
Court Administrator
Judge |
|
|
| |
|
DRIVER LICENSE INFORMATION; RETAILER
USE
Rep. Konopnicki
Prescribes conditions for retailer
retention and use of information from a customer’s driver’s license or other
state issued identification. Use of the information in a court or
administrative proceeding is not prohibited. Enforcement against a retailer
may be through either the county attorney or Attorney General, who may
obtain injunctive relief and recover costs, attorney fees and penalties.
The civil penalty shall not exceed $500 for a first violation, $1000 for a
second violation, and $5000 for a third or subsequent violation.
Statute(s) Created: 44-7701
Court Impact:
May result in new filings for injunctive relief and civil penalties against
retailers for improper use of a customer's driver's license or ID
information.
Back to Top |
|
Chapter 219 SB1029
Effective Date
General
|
Item of interest to: |
|
|
|
Justice of the Peace Court
Court Clerk
Court Administrator
Judge |
|
Municipal Court
Court Clerk
Court Administrator
Judge/Magistrate |
| |
|
DUI; 0.20 CONCENTRATION ENHANCEMENT
Sen. Waring
Requires a person convicted of a first
DUI (A.R.S. §28-1381) to have an ignition interlock device installed
pursuant to A.R.S. §28-3319 for a minimum of 12 months. The court may order
the individual to have the device for longer than 12 months.
Requires a person convicted of Extreme
DUI with a Blood Alcohol Concentration of .20 or more to be sentenced to
serve not less than 45 consecutive days in jail. The person is not eligible
for probation or suspension of execution of sentence unless the entire
sentence is served. Requires the person to pay a fine of not less than $500
and use an ignition interlock device pursuant to A.R.S. §28-3319 for 18
months.
Requires a person convicted of an
Extreme DUI with a Blood Alcohol Concentration of .20 or more with a prior
DUI conviction within 84 months to be sentenced to 180 days in jail, 90 of
which must be served consecutively. The person is not eligible for
probation or suspension of execution of sentence unless the entire sentence
has been served. Requires the person to pay a fine of not less than $1,000
and use an ignition interlock device pursuant to A.R.S. §28-3319 for 24
months.
Note, contrary to Chapter 195, this
chapter does not prohibit suspension of a portion of the minimum sentence
for an Extreme DUI with a BAC of below .20.
Statute(s) Impacted: 28-1381,
28-1382, 28-3319
Court Impact:
Requires specific, increased penalties for conviction of DUI.
Back to Top |
|
Chapter 278 HB2753
Effective Date
General
|
Item of interest to: |
|
|
|
Justice of the Peace Court
Court Clerk
Court Administrator
Judge |
|
Municipal Court
Court Clerk
Court Administrator
Judge/Magistrate |
| |
|
VEHICLE IMPOUNDMENT AND
IMMOBILIZATION
Rep. Pearce
In pertinent part, requires an
impounding agency to allow access to the owner of a vehicle for the purpose
of inspecting it for damage or to a representative of an ignition interlock
device company seeking to remove the device. An agency is prohibited from
charging a fee for the access. Failure to allow access is a Class 2
misdemeanor. An owner who does not inspect the vehicle prior to the removal
of the device creates a rebuttable presumption that any damage to the
vehicle did not occur while in possession of the impounding agency. Does
not create a cause of action against an impounding agency for allowing
access to a representative of an ignition interlock device company. An
individual who violates an agreement to prevent an unlicensed driver from
operating a vehicle or a lending entity who releases a vehicle to an owner
in violation of statute is subject to a minimum civil penalty of $250.
Statute(s) Impacted: 28-3511,
28-3512, 28-3513, 28-3514, 28-3815, 41-1752
Statute(s) Created: 28-4848
Court Impact:
Justice courts will need to be familiar with the changes to existing
statutes, regarding the impoundment and immobilization of motor vehicles
operated by persons who do not have a valid driving privilege, in order to
properly conduct an immobilization or poststorage hearing to determine the
validity of the immobilization or storage.
Generalizes the existing, specific
driver’s license suspensions and revocations that will result in vehicle
impoundment or immobilization to now simply include any driver’s license
suspension or revocation, for whatever reason; the driver cannot produce
evidence of ever having a valid license or permit issued by another
jurisdiction; failure to have a required ignition interlock device.
Eliminates the exemption from vehicle impoundment for a minor driving a
parent’s or guardian’s vehicle when the minor has consumed alcohol.
Requires proof of a rental agreement, effective on the date of impoundment,
if the owner is in the business of renting vehicles and is requesting
release prior to the end of the 30-day impoundment period. Clarifies that
the spouse or any other vehicle owner requesting vehicle release prior to
the end of the 30-day impoundment period had to be listed on the Department
of Transportation’s (DOT) records as an owner at the time of impoundment.
Provides that if a spouse or vehicle owner requests release of the vehicle
before the end of the 30-day impoundment period and enters into an agreement
with the impounding agency prohibiting operation of the released vehicle by
an unlicensed driver, the spouse or other owner will be ineligible for early
release of the vehicle if it is subsequently impounded within one year.
Adds "a valid salvage or dismantle certificate" to the proof of ownership
documents necessary for release of a vehicle. Requires proof of motor
vehicle liability insurance as a condition of releasing the vehicle.
Clarifies that an owner in the business of renting vehicles, a motor vehicle
dealer, or a financial institution that requests the release of a vehicle
must pay administrative charges to the impounding agency. Specifies that
the person requesting release of the vehicle on behalf of a rental company
or financial institution cannot be the person who was operating the vehicle
at the time of impoundment.
States that a person to whom a vehicle
has been released, other than an owner, identified in the DOT's records as
having an interest in the vehicle, (e.g. a rental car company, motor
vehicle dealer or financial institution) cannot return the impounded vehicle
to the person who was operating the vehicle at the time of impoundment
unless the vehicle owner or owner’s agent presents a valid driver’s license,
current vehicle registration or salvage or dismantle title and evidence of a
motor vehicle liability policy. Violation constitutes a civil traffic
violation, subject to a civil penalty of $250.
Establishes a new civil traffic
violation, subject to a civil penalty of $250, for a person who enters into
an agreement with the impounding agency for early release of the vehicle who
then allows a person to operate the vehicle in violation of the agreement.
Alters the time from five working days
to five business days within which a justice court must conduct a post
storage hearing after receiving a hearing request. Limits the time to
within ten days after the date on the notice of impoundment that a vehicle
owner, spouse or other person may request a post storage hearing. Specifies
that a person is entitled to only one post storage hearing with either the
impounding agency or a justice court, but not both.
Establishes a new class 2 misdemeanor
for a towing company, storage yard, facility or person that has physical
possession of a vehicle who refuses access or charges a fee during normal
business hours to an ignition interlock device manufacturer or installer or
a person who is listed as a lien holder on the DOT’s records for the purpose
of removing an interlock device from the vehicle or assessing the vehicle’s
condition.
Back to Top |
|
Chapter 296 SB1640
Effective Date
General
|
Item of interest to: |
|
Superior Court
Clerk of Court
Court Administrator
Judge |
|
Justice of the Peace Court
Court Clerk
Court Administrator
Judge |
|
Municipal Court
Court Clerk
Court Administrator
Judge/Magistrate |
| |
|
FOREIGN MOTOR CARRIERS
Sen. Verschoor
In pertinent part, expands the jurisdiction of
municipal and justice courts to include concurrent jurisdiction over all
misdemeanor traffic violations listed in Title 28, Chapters 5,11,14, and 15
and Class 2 and 3 misdemeanor violations in Chapter 25.
Statute(s) Impacted: 28-1552,
28-6355
Statute(s) Created: 28-5244
Court Impact:
Places the following restrictions on motor carriers, all of which can
constitute a class 1 or 2 misdemeanor or class 6 felony, under existing
A.R.S. sec. 28-5240 (depending on the number of previous offenses):
prohibits foreign motor carriers from operating in Arizona without a
certificate of registration in the vehicle or refusing to show the
certificate to a peace officer or an employee of the Department of
Transportation; prohibits foreign carriers from operating outside the
restrictions in the registration certificate; prohibits foreign carriers
from providing point to point transportation services for any goods other
than international goods; requires foreign carrier vehicles to be inspected
by a commercial vehicle safety alliance certified inspector every three
months; requires foreign carrier vehicles to display a safety inspection
decal for at least three years after receiving permanent operating
authority; prohibits interstate carriers from operating without or outside
the bounds of a registration certificate.
Expands the jurisdiction of municipal and justice
courts to include the following misdemeanor criminal violations in Title 28:
-
failing to notify the Motor Vehicle Department of a
name or address change
-
injuring or preventing operation of a vehicle
-
committing a traffic violation while transporting
hazardous material
-
directing or knowingly permitting an employee or
driver to violate the law
-
illegally canceling a traffic citation
-
failing to stop or present identification when
requested by a peace officer
-
failing to notify law enforcement of the previous
location of a towed vehicle
-
failing to report that a vehicle is lost, stolen,
abandoned, unclaimed or seized
-
failing to report that a vehicle is abandoned in a
public garage or parking lot
-
refusing to permit inspection of a vehicle
-
violating motor carrier regulations
-
operating a motor carrier under an out-of-service
order
-
operating an overweight vehicle
-
violating gross weight restrictions with regard to
fees
-
dumping trash on highways or airports
-
constructing an unauthorized bridge or dam
-
failing to construct, maintain or repair a bridge as
required by law
-
violating regulations pertaining to aircraft
operations
-
failing to provide an affidavit of total loss of an
aircraft to the Arizona Department of Transportation
Removes language that limits municipal
and justice court jurisdiction to specific chapters in Title 28, thereby
allowing courts to rule on violations in the entire title.
Back to Top |