|
Outstanding
Contribution to the Courts Award |
|
||
![]() |
Improving
Public Trust and Confidence |
||
| Distinguished
Service Award for Victims and Victims’ Rights. He was chosen for his
leadership in assuring better treatment of crime victims. Judge Reinstein also serves on the National Commission on the Future of DNA Evidence, of which he chairs the Post-Conviction Issues Committee, the National Advisory Board of the U.S. Department of Justice Center for Sex Offender Management, and the Governor’s Children’s Justice Task Force. Judge Reinstein received his J.D. from the Indiana University School of Law in 1973 and his Bachelor of Arts degree with honors in political science and zoology from in 1970. |
|||
| Administration
of Justice Award
Paul Julien Judicial Education Officer, Education Services Division Administrative Office of the Courts Mr. Julien created “Res Nova” hotline, and has answered approximately 300 questions from judges. He coordinates with AOC Court Services and Legal Services to ensure internal consistency in responses. With comments from Court Services and the Commission on Judicial Conduct, Mr. Julien revised the Mentor Program’s selection criteria and the application and selection process. In addition, all newly appointed limited jurisdiction court judges were matched with mentor judges through this program. New limited jurisdiction judges are also taught, mentored, and assisted by Mr. Julien through New Judge Orientation. In 2004, |
![]() |
||
| he
attended an advanced course on special courts jurisdiction through the The intense two-week session brought together judges and leaders from across the On occasion, Mr. Julien is appointed to serve as a pro tempore judge for the State of Mr. Julien received his Master of Arts and a Doctor of Education from |
|||
|
|
|||
![]() |
James
B. Reed, Esq. As the Chair of the Accessibility Subcommittee to the State Bar of Arizona Committee on Persons in the Legal Profession with Disabilities, James Reed was the leading force behind a statewide survey of With Mr. Reed’s persistence and the help of other committee members and volunteers, 39 courthouses were visited in each of The finished survey and report can be viewed at www.azbar.org/Legal/Resources/TF/2005CourthouseSurvey.cfm. The final report is used as a guideline for other courts statewide and throughout the nation. Mr. Reed is a partner at Baird Williams & Greer LLP in |
||
| E-Citation
Project In the Summer of 2005, Tucson City Court and the Tucson Police Department worked with Advanced Public Safety (APS) to establish an Electronic Citation Management System. This eliminates the need for Tucson Police Officers to hand-write citations, and allows the Court to successfully receive the citations electronically and download them to AZTEC, the Court’s case management system. More than 23,000 citations have successfully transferred from the officers’ electronic citation writer (handheld device) to AZTEC. This saves court personnel time and increases data accuracy. While, a handwritten citation may take up to a week to reach the |
![]() |
||
| Court,
by using the handheld device, citation information is available to court
staff and customers within 24 hours of the officer docking the handheld
at the end of his or her shift. Tucson City Court has sponsored several demonstrations of the E-Citation Project throughout the |
|||
|
|
|||
![]() |
Family Court – The Maricopa
Model
-
Superior Court in
Under the leadership of the Honorable Norman Davis, Family Court
Presiding Judge, a comprehensive plan to restructure Family Court was
established. The plan was based on the findings of a study addressing
issues and challenges attorneys, litigants, and families experienced
with dealing with Family Court. This is known as the Maricopa Model and
includes 29 initiatives. Some of the initiatives include: |
||
|
- Decree on Demand: Reduces litigants’
waiting time to obtain default or consent decrees, or orders. - Post Early Resolution Triage Program: Self-representing litigants in contested cases meet with staff members to mediate their differences. - Uniform Case Management: Promptly and fairly resolves each case with a specific process designed or that case and others with similar characteristics. The new case management system has reduced the number of open family cases by 29 percent; and most changes were implemented without budgetary impact. The Maricopa Model is a dramatic and innovative change that has reduced unnecessary delay for litigants. It allows self-represented litigants a structure to move their cases forward and reduces frustration. This, in turn, reduces financial hardship and trauma to family relationships. |
|||
|
Family Law Bench Child Support Program
Superior Court in
|
![]() |
||
| supports
the project. They also equip the project with computers and provide the
necessary technical support. More than 700 |
|||
|
|
|||
![]() |
Permanency Planning Mediation
Program
-
Superior Court in The Permanency Planning Mediation Program (PPM), instituted in December 2004, orders that a permanency planning mediation be held in all newly filed dependency cases. This is scheduled so that true permanency planning and realistic discussions regarding prompt outcomes for children in the child welfare system can occur They also discuss: |
||
|
·
Each of the options available; · Consideration of the most appropriate plan; · Identification of a concurrent plan when appropriate; · Review of services designed to achieve the plan; · Identification of barriers to achieving the case plan goal; and · A long-term strategy for the care of the child. The entire process focuses on the accountability and obligations of all involved parties, including the obligation of Child Protective Services to provide services. Presiding Judge Robert M. Brutinel, Kathy McCormick, Alternative Dispute Resolution Coordinator/Conciliation Court Director, and |
|||
|
The limited and general jurisdiction courts in |
![]() |
||
|
· Quality and Access to Justice · Structure and Administration · Facilities and Operations · Information and Technology · Community Outreach and Partnerships Members of the Flagstaff City Council, Coconino County Board of Supervisors, city and county staff, attorneys, professors, citizens and high school students attended the forum. The Justice 2025 management team made year long preparations for the forum. · Honorable Fred Newton, Presiding Judge, Superior Court in · Gary Krcmarik, · Donald Jacobson, · Joy Dillehay, · Martha Delgadillo, Superior Court Administrative Senior Manager · Brenda Wagenknecht-Ivey, · Dennis Metrick, Court Operations Director, · Sharon Sawicky, Justice 2025 Project Manager The Forum helped set priorities for the future of Coconino County's courts and bring members of all three branches of government together. |
|||
|
|
|||
![]() |
Williams
J. Harkins III, Probation Officer Superior Court in Maricopa County William J. Harkins has served eight years in the Fugitive Apprehension Unit of the Adult Probation Department in Highly respected among his peers and supervisors, Officer Harkins is dedicated to the department’s mission and always acts professionally toward probationers. He frequently volunteers for problem cases and provides assistance to junior officers. He resolves public safety concerns immediately and without hesitation; and continually produces excellent arrest numbers. Officer Harkins is the first probation officer from the department to be deputized as a U.S. Marshal. This past year, Officer Harkins was shot and seriously injured while on-duty. Through months of hospitalization and physical therapy he has maintained a positive attitude, and continues to be a source of inspiration for probation officers throughout Arizona. |
||
| The
U.S. Department of Justice, the Arizona Probation Chiefs, and his own
department have all honored him as Officer of the Year.
The Award’s Committee is pleased to honor Officer Harkins for his substantial contributions to public protection and increasing the public’s confidence in the courts. |
|||
| Ron
Beguin, Information Systems and Technology Director Phoenix Municipal Court
Considered the “Master Architect” of the Phoenix Municipal Court’s
Case Management System (CMS), Ron Beguin has a 17-year history of
improving efficiency by applying technology to court systems.
|
![]() |
||
|
· Environmental
Complaint Processing He
implemented an Electronic Documents Management System that utilizes magnetic media storage while eliminating manual intervention for data retrieval. The implementation adhered to this success is associated to Mr. Beguin’s dedication, leadership style, integrity, and his commitment to continuous technological improvements. He has earned the respect of his staff, court management, City of Phoenix Municipal Court has many opportunities to achieve optimum results for public access, and ensuring the efficient operation of the courtrooms and case processing because of Mr. Beguin’s hard work and innovation. |
|||
Improving Communications and Cooperation with the Community, Other Branches of Government, and within the Judicial Branch |
|||
![]() |
Criminal
Justice Forum: Building a Safer Community Through Awareness
and Change - Superior Court in Pinal County Elected officials representing the criminal justice system collaborated to host eight public forums throughout Former Presiding Superior Court Judge William J. O’Neil, |
||
| County
Citizens were asked to complete a survey at the conclusion of the forum. The survey found that 81 percent of attendees agreed they had a better understanding of the courts and criminal justice system; and 86 percent agreed they must play a role in the responsibility of community’s safety. Not only did the community benefit from the forums; there is now an increased understanding and collaboration between the involved agencies. These collaborations have resulted in the establishment of mentor programs using community volunteers in local schools by the Juvenile Court Services Department, increased participation of county leadership on court committees, and among many other accomplishments. |
|||
| Gila
County Probation Department and Gila County School Superintendent
Collaboration - Superior Court in Gila County In June 2005, Gila County Chief Probation Officer Dr. Hellen J. Carter and Gila County School Superintendent Dr. Linda O’Dell developed a concept to create a “probation” school that provides a quality education to youth who don’t succeed in traditional education venues, or who have been released from detention. The Globe and |
![]() |
||
| Probation
Officer involvement is essential to the program. The officers teach the
students the Life Skills program developed by the National Curriculum
Training Institute of Phoenix. The students are responding to the
curriculum in a positive way; and when visiting the Globe center,
Congressman Rick Renzi was impressed with the level of introspection the
youth had in the curriculum discussion topics.
Sixty-two students have enrolled in the Overall, the Gila County Probation Department connecting with the school system has allowed the students to realize the importance of education. |
|||
![]() |
Spanish
DUI Court Superior Court in Maricopa County The Although traditional |
||
| Defendants
are able to understand all of the proceedings in · Acknowledge responsibility for their actions; · Reduce their use of alcohol and drug use; · Reintegrate them into the community; · Reduce their likelihood of re-offending; · Reintegrate them into their families; · Increase their employment status; and · Increase their re-enrollment in school, where applicable. The program takes a minimum of one year to successfully complete, and approximately 88 percent of participants graduate. The Spanish DUI Courts provide a vital link in the chain of accountability, in order to preserve community safety. |
|||
|
|
|||
| Judicial
Formation Program Superior Court in Maricopa County The “Judicial Formation Program” provides a foundation for new judges to help them appreciate their role in assuring public trust and confidence in the courts. Judges and commissioners who have served for three years or less spend time together each month to increase collegiality and teamwork. Topics include: · The Judge as a Person · Fairness and Access to the Court · Stress and Dealing with Difficult People · Cultural Competency · A View from the Eyes of the Presiding Judge · Listening and Emotional Intelligence · How to be Courteous and Professional with the Jury |
![]() |
||
|
· Looking Back on a
Judicial Career – the Court from the Eyes of Recently or Soon to be Retired Judges The Judicial Formation Program focuses on personal growth and development to improve the profession of judicial officers. The program also helps deepen their understanding of how the vocation of a judge differs from the role as a lawyer. Judges and commissioners have appreciated the opportunity to participate, and believe they are better judges and citizens as a result. |
|||
![]() |
David
Tierney, Esq (accepting award for David Tierney, Susan Tierney) A successful private attorney, David Tierney volunteers extensively to the community by contributing legal expertise, business savvy and communication skills. Mr. Tierney served on an advisory committee that helped the Maricopa County Adult Probation Department with strategic planning and prioritizing. His desire, commitment and skill led to the creation of the Restorative Justice Resources Coalition (RCJC), a nonprofit organization comprised of private citizens that request and receive private funds and expands partnership capabilities. RCJC assists probationers and probation programs in |
||
| adults to read and write. The coalition
also selects projects that benefit the community and use the labor of
supervised probationers completing community service to repair and
upgrade buildings and properties. RCJC assisted With Mr. Tierney’s efforts, many different entities have made successful connections ensuing positive results for the judicial branch and the community. With extraordinary skill and dedication, he brings the right people together and keeps working until the vision has become a reality. The Arizona Judicial Branch is grateful for his service |
|||